James MacLaren's blog
Book Review: All For A Few Perfect Waves, The Audacious Life And Legend Of Rebel Surfer Miki Dora
David Rensin, 2008, HarperCollins, ISBN 978-0-06-077331-1
Very well then, the short review is â€œGet this book and read it,â€ ok?
The short review with a little bit extra tossed in is â€œGet this book and read it, and while reading it, try to keep the transcendent meanings of â€˜good & evilâ€™ always in mind, and watch in amazement as they morph from one thing to another, and even trade places with each other, shrouded underneath a nimbus of time and circumstance.â€
Ok, thatâ€™s enough right there for those of you with dull sensibilities, sound-bite sized attention spans, or dogmatic world views that cannot admit to the existence of equally valid alternatives, other than your own constricted visions. You probably wonâ€™t read the book anyway, and even if you do, youâ€™ll find a way to take the wrong message away from it after youâ€™re done. You may go now, you are dismissed.
Now, as for the rest of you, now that weâ€™ve gotten rid of the idiots, let us perhaps see if we can examine things in somewhat greater detail, shall we?
Ants reap all the benefits of life in the colony, and succeed mightily as a result and have taken over the world, but in the end they must always remain ants.
Edward Abbey did not think very highly of ants, however. Go read Desert Solitaire sometime. Might just do you some good. You never know.
Dora shared many of Abbeyâ€™s approaches, although Iâ€™m none too sure that either curmudgeon would have approved of the other. But I could be very wrong here, since I do not really know wherefore I speak.
Dora seems to have approved of very little, actually.
And he was a lying thief with a spiteful mean streak, too. A real small-timer. A bum. A failure.
And yet againâ€¦
He somehow rose above it all to truly ethereal heights where few have trodden, aside from a very few saints and madmen.
And this of course is both the problem and the solution, all at the same time.
Surfing is so overburdened with counterintuitiveness and self-contradiction, that it would seem that it could not stand another log to be thrown on to that fire, lest the entirety of it self-immolate and disappear in a cloud of smoke, leaving a bitter residue of ashes behind in the mouths of those who would seek to understand it.
Dora seems to have thrown the entire forest into the blaze, and yet he got away with it somehow.
His story is allegory, and it enfolds and encloses no end of substories and branching paths that lead off into the murk with nary a street sign to show the way.
Some of these places are pretty nasty, but others seem to shine from within by their own ghostly light.
This review is already turning into the worst sort of bullshit.
Considering the subject matter, could we have expected otherwise?
Iâ€™ve been long convinced that there is a book the likes of which few have been written, lurking within the Dora cloud. A book that could use this impossibly fertile ground to nurture and coax from the black and fecal substrate, a grand tale that examines the core issues of what it really means to be human being.
Iâ€™m not quite convinced that this is the book, but I may be wrong. Right or wrong, this book is a thunderclap of a good effort, and may even provide the launching pad for an as yet unknown or unborn Shakespeare to really sink their teeth into things and extract that which needs to be extracted and distill it into a Worthy Thing.
And, as with its subject matter, it presents one face even as it hides other faces in plain sight.
Itâ€™s easy enough to let this one pass through your fingers as a mere recounting of things that were, things that were said, and things that were done, and no more.
But thereâ€™s a lot more than that going on underneath the surface, for those with the time, patience, and eyes to see any of it.
Up on the surface of things, this one is drop-dead simple: A tale of the manâ€™s life, from start to finish, as told by those who were around at any given time, as well as the occasional cryptic snatch of prose from the man himself, with a few black & white photographs tossed in for good measure.
Of course it is.
And yet againâ€¦
Patterns self-assemble and evanesce with their own sentience, as the story minds its own business, plodding forward in time.
Dora took the measure of those and that, all around him, and found nearly all of it wanting.
At which point he very reasonably decided to keep his own counsel, and veer off on a path of his own choosing, opportunistic, never permitting anything or anyone to dictate terms to him.
Except for the waves.
The waves dictated his entire life, and he was content to everlastingly dance to their tune.
But the ways of waves and men run counter to each other, and following one will cause grave problems with the other.
Dora had no doubt whatsoever as to which one was worthy. Which one was real. Which one was the Right Way.
And blast and damn any and all who might seek to interfere.
Which is the entire nub of the matter, in similar fashion as a single molecule of DNA is the nub of each of us, one and all.
Much flows from this deceptively simple premise.
Dora, perhaps more than anyone ever has, and perhaps ever will, in a world of proliferating security cameras, biometrics, secret databases, and jackboots, took this disarmingly simple premise to its furthest logical conclusion, paid dearly for it, and yet never looked back and never reconsidered his choice, once it had been made. Despite the Gordian knot of falsehood that he partook of, surrounded himself with, and promulgated, he remained true in the most adamantine definition of the word true that can be imagined.
All of this is woven into the heart of this book, at sub-basement level, and illuminates all that happens within it.
David Rensin presumes his readers to have sufficient intelligence to work things out for themselves, and mercifully assembles the tale with a feather-light hand. The story itself can do its own talking thank you very much, and itâ€™s a breath of fresh air to encounter a writer who has tackled such a profound subject and yet dispenses with the pedantic, the didactic, the morality tale and the fable, and instead simply lets things speak for themselves.
Like I said before: â€œGet this book and read it,â€ ok?
Alright then, weâ€™ve all seen â€˜em, yes? Those little notices on the front door, or perhaps the plate glass somewhere, that advise would-be robbers that thereâ€™s hardly any money on the premises. Theyâ€™re so common, nobody even notices them.
What the fuck is the deal with these things?
Who, exactly, were they written for?
Who, exactly, figured it would be a good idea to spend the money to manufacture them, and then spend further money to take the time to
have somebody actually paste the thing up there?
And who, exactly, thinks that they do the slightest bit of good in the first place?
I can smell lawyers in here somewhere, I just know it!
Back to the sign. So like Iâ€™m a crack guy with a serious jones going and I walk up to the store with my pistol in my pocket, intending to get money so I can then get some more of that ripping good crack Iâ€™ve been smoking.
But I see the sign first! Oh no! â€œLess than $20.00.â€ Fuck. And that sonofabitch crack dealer of mine wants $30.00! Well I guess thatâ€™s
that. May as well keep the gun in my pocket and go back home. Maybe watch a movie on tv or something?
Does ANYbody out there see this happening? Any of you?
Tell me please, whatâ€™s one of the strongest statements you can make about a personâ€™s stupidity? Thatâ€™s right, itâ€™s â€œAre you smoking crack?â€
Should we expect somebody whoâ€™s already THAT STUPID to be able to make a rational decision based upon a little sign that says, â€œLess than $20.00?â€ As heâ€™s walking up to the door with a gun in his pocket?
Something tells me here that this just isnâ€™t going to work. At all.
In the first place, can the guy even READ? After all, heâ€™s a fucking crackhead, right? Can crackheads read? My guess is: No. They canâ€™t read. So much for the sign right there.
But letâ€™s suppose our crackhead is different. Letâ€™s suppose he CAN read. Maybe he used to be an English professor or something. It could happen. Will the sign work now?
No, it will not work now. That fucking sign still doesnâ€™t have a prayer.
At this point, Joe Crackhead has to BELIEVE the sign. Do YOU believe that sign? Do YOU think that thereâ€™s less than $20.00 in the till? Even at three in the morning? Somehow, those guys are able to make change all night long to everybody who walks in to the place. Can this be done with $20.00? No, it canâ€™t be done with $20.00. I know it. You know it. And Joe Crackhead knows it too.
Not that Joe would give two shits if the fucking till only had $.37 in it anyway. Joe will gladly take the $.37 and then cheerfully head on down the road to the next place. You see, Joe may not be able to read, but he CAN add. And he knows that if he only got $.37 at the last place he knocked over, heâ€™s gonna have to ADD a little something to that amount in order to score his next bag of rocks. Duh!
And letâ€™s not forget that Joe also knows that the people inside the store are very likely to have a little money on them too. So what if the fucking register ainâ€™t got any fucking money? YOU do! Give me yours. NOW! Are YOU going to tell a nervous crackhead waving a pistol in your face that he canâ€™t have your money? Probably not, huh. Joe knows THIS, too.
Of course, we are now getting into a realm where the sign
is no longer responsible. After all, the sign only said the cash register had less than twenty bucks. It never said a word about anybodyâ€™s wallet, right? But I donâ€™t care. That fucking sign STARTED this whole thing and by god for all I care it can FINISH it.
But of course it canâ€™t. That sign canâ€™t do anything.
So would somebody please tell me why in the name of hell itâ€™s there in the first place?
Book Review: Canï¿½t You Get Along With Anyone?
Allan Weisbecker, Still looking for a good publisher, aweisbecker.com
This shitï¿½s complicated.
Weisbecker is a man who has seen too much.
This book has strong and surprising parallels with Solzhenitsynï¿½s Gulag Archipelago with regard to the tremendous amount of detail, and an unstinting use of very numerous examples of things that might seem unnecessarily obscure/redundant/trivial to continue to make points and explicate other parts of the book. Also a fearless willingness to break various rules of the writing business to ensure that the reader SEES whatï¿½s actually going on.
They eat better than the people in The Gulag Archipelago, but this is misleading if you take it to mean that they are somehow doing better than the people in Gulag. Although the depths of monstrous evil that get plumbed in places like Norilsk and Magadan are never reached by the subjects in CYGAWA, there is a signal lack of moral compass in nearly every last person who moves through this book, author included at times. This inability to navigate in morals-space causes no end of metaphorical car crashes, train wrecks, boat sinkings, and societal castaways wandering in the wilderness until the wolves hunt them down and finish them off. The inmates of the Gulag oftentimes reach saintly heights of human purity, even as they continue to get ravaged by the inhuman forces that shove them through the fetid pipes of Stalinï¿½s sewage system. No such thing ever happens to the denizens of CYGAWA. No lessons get learned. Nothing ever seems to touch anyoneï¿½s soul, winners and losers alike.
Solzhenitsyn speaks of morals, and so does Weisbecker. Both address this, the most central of human themes, in a no-nonsense headlong attempt to get to the bottom of matters. Solzhenitsyn was blessedly fortunate in that his relentless digging deep into the foulness of Things People Do To Other People actually seems to have had some salutary effect on things, at least temporarily. Weisbecker may not be so fortunate, and the demons that torment him, and his cries about the injustice of it all, may all wind up only being some kind of private dystopia. I very strongly hope Iï¿½m wrong on this, but rely on people to sink to the bottom and youï¿½ll do well as a seer for the most part.
Weisbecker has journeyed extensively through the nether reaches of both the physical world around us, and also the spiritual world within us. He appears to have begun his journey early in life for short-sighted personal motives, and seems not to have had the slightest idea of where he was ultimately going, what he might encounter there, nor what any of it might ultimately wind up wreaking upon his person.
Solzhenitsyn admits to his moral failures and is upfront about them. The same applies to Weisbecker. Solzhenitsyn took a personal journey through the darkest parts of hell, and seems to have drawn the right conclusions from it. The same applies to Weisbecker.
After all, what could you possibly say bad about somebody who includes an H.L. Mencken quote as a chapter header?
Weisbecker is obviously getting his share of karmic paybacks, from a long time ago.
Alan Weisbecker is a fuckup, in the exact same sense that Alexandr Solzhenitsyn is a fuckup. Both of them paid mightily for wagging their tongues at the wrong time, to the wrong people, and in an even more uncanny similarity, the tongue-wagging in question was in regards to the incompetence of those in power, around them. And Iï¿½m convinced that neither one of them was constitutionally equipped to refrain from their self-catastrophic behavior. They simply could not sit idly by as the bullshit accumulated around them, and fail to attempt to warn their fellow humans about the bullshit that only they could see. Call it ï¿½canary in a coal mineï¿½ syndrome, and you wonï¿½t be far wrong. These sorts of people are one of the human raceï¿½s early warning systems. They are allergic to bullshit, and this makes them break out in metaphorical hives in the presence of concentrations of bullshit that other humans arenï¿½t even aware of. Unfortunately, as with other severe allergic reactions, this is usually worse for the reactor than it is for the surrounding mindless herd of bipeds.
Solzhenitsyn was just as much a part of the problem as Allan Weisbecker. Weisbecker was a drug runner, and god only knows what sorts of shithole things he did while he was plying his self-interested trade. Iï¿½ve unfortunately known more than my share of these people in my life (I dabbled in this kind of thing for a while as a young man, but never fully entered this dark world, for reasons I still do not quite understand myself.) and every last one of them have got some heavy infractions going, and Iï¿½m most very definitely not just speaking in a strictly legalistic sense of ï¿½dopeï¿½s illegalï¿½ and since you bucked the system, youï¿½re a crook. Solzhenitsyn was an officer in the Red Army, and even though it was the Red Army that eventually kept Hitlerï¿½s heels from clicking on the parquet floors of St. Basilï¿½s Cathedral on Red Square, the Red Army was also one of the main props (the other being the secret police) that kept a horrifically evil political regime in place for decades. So the both of them, Allan and Alexandr, have some pretty heavy karma to pay back. Solzhenitsyn seems to have descended lower, and therefore subsequently ascended higher, than Weisbecker, but in truth the juryï¿½s still out on that one. Furthermore, neither one of these guys really gets fully to the nub of their own personal infractions. Yes indeed, they speak of being in the wrong, and go so far as to trot out various and sundry examples in an effort to own up to their personal wrongdoings, but itï¿½s never done with the same vigor and relish as itï¿½s done when trotting out various and sundry examples of the wrongdoing they see around themselves. And, in yet another twist, Iï¿½m pretty sure that if they DID get to the nub of their own wrongdoings, it would detract from their work to the point of making their writing unreadable. Nobody wants to read a hundred thousand words of self-flagellation.
Oftentimes, seeing too much can only occur when the viewer is fully engaged in doing something they shouldnï¿½t be doing.
Weisbecker does a lot of looping. Iï¿½m not sure exactly what looping is, but Wendy Hubbert thinks itï¿½s a very bad thing. My own personal opinion on the matter is that Wendy Hubbert is full of shit, and Weisbeckerï¿½s looping, whatever it may be, adds an element of depth to his work, without which, said work would be a much thinner gruel indeed.
This is a writerï¿½s book about writing. And when I say writer, I mean Writer. Iï¿½ve already compared Weisbeckerï¿½s writing with Alexandr Solzhenitsynï¿½s, and now Iï¿½m going to compare it to Mark Twainï¿½s. Alexandr Solzhenitsyn got a Nobel Prize for The Gulag Archipelago. Twain, Iï¿½m sure, would have knocked down his own Nobel Prize, had they been a going thing during those years in which he was producing his best work. Alexandr Solzhenitsynï¿½s is a Writer. Mark Twain is a Writer. And Allan Weisbecker is a Writer.
Writing is not just writing. Superb writing only happens when the person whoï¿½s doing the writing has actually lived. We all know people who arenï¿½t alive, just as we all know people who are very alive. Itï¿½s the oneï¿½s who are very alive who are actually living. If this makes no sense to you, or you need to have it further explained to properly understand it, then I submit to you that youï¿½re not really living and will always miss the point of paragraphs such as this one. Weisbecker, has lived and continues to live. Which means that thereï¿½s going to be more where the like of Canï¿½t You Get Along With Anyone comes from. Which may or may not be such a good thing for Allan Weisbecker, who must endure the living of it prior to doing any Writing about it.
Weisbecker wants not only to know the truth, he also wants very much to pass the truth along to his fellow humans. This motivation, in people like Allan Weisbecker, is atavistic, cannot be smothered even if the person doing so wishes to smother it, and leads directly a whole world of grief when those for whom the truth is inconvenient get even with the truth-teller. The supreme irony consists in the fact that those whom the truth teller is trying to alert to the truth are themselves completely unworthy of knowing the truth, and will in fact discard the truth like used toilet paper even when itï¿½s handed to them on a silver platter. Most people hate the truth, because it interferes with their personal, self-aggrandizing, agendas.
Everything above that was said about the truth notwithstanding, if the truth is ever extinguished we all die. For that reason alone, it is absolutely vital that truth-tellers continue to dwell amongst us with their inconvenient rantings and ravings. Cherish those truth-tellers that you have come in contact with. They are trying to save your sorry ass, despite your best efforts to the contrary.
Did I mention before that ï¿½This shitï¿½s complicatedï¿½?
Iï¿½m not sure I like the idea that fair-sized excerpts taken directly out of this book can be found on Weisbeckerï¿½s web page. Running along through the book, hitting a section that Iï¿½ve already read kind of interrupts the uptake flow. Might just be a personal thing with me, and then again it might not. Everything else on the website is spot fucking on.
The documentation on the website is yet another parallel with Solzhenitsyn. Solzhenitsyn put EVERYTHING in his book itself, whereas Weisbecker has left a fair bit out of the book, but makes it available on his webpage. Itï¿½s a matter of personal choice I suppose, coupled with the fact that when Alexandr Solzhenitsyn was putting The Gulag Archipelago together, and leaking it to the world via samizdat, there was no such thing as a webpage and so the whole works had to go between the covers or not show up at all. The word count in all three volumes of The Gulag Archipelago is enormous, and Iï¿½m guessing the same is going to be true for Canï¿½t You Get Along With Anyone once all the exterior supporting material and all the rest of it is taken into proper account. Both authors believe strongly in documenting their tales. A lot of what both of them write is the kind of stuff that itï¿½s far far easier to simply not believe. Itï¿½s just all too much. WAY too much. No way could all this shit have ever happened in the real world. And, more parallels here, both authors seem to know this sort of thing instinctively, and since they know that thereï¿½s a lot of vested interests and cooperative fools out there who will seek to sweep away all that they have been through and all they have written about it, they both lay down an overwhelming amount of supporting material and backup documentation. Thanks guys. The extra effort shows, and itï¿½s well worth it to be able to go through it all. Adds to oneï¿½s understanding in a way that nothing else can.
One way in which Weisbeckerï¿½s and Solzhenitsynï¿½s books differ, signally, is that The Gulag Archipelago is this great, thundering, grave thing, that in no way can be made light of or trivialized. Not so with Canï¿½t You Get Along With Anyone. Far from it, in fact. And I suspect that Allanï¿½s enemies are going to attack the man and the book from this very angle. Itï¿½s a fucking story about some whack guy who ran off to the end of the road and threw himself wholesale into all manner of self-indulging things, and what happened, more or less, as a result of all this. A guy, I might add, who has already owned up in a previous book to a whale of a lot of unsavory goings on. All of the foregoing is both an Achillesï¿½ heel, and a secret strength to Canï¿½t You Get Along With Anyone. Itï¿½s going to cause an awful lot of people to just brush the whole thing off as the whinings of an aging hedonist. These people can be relied upon to do their ad hominem worst to smother this baby in its crib, and for a lot of the less than fully critical people out there, their smothering will work. But. And a big but it isï¿½ Alan has plumbed the depths of the human soul, his own included, in a way, and in places, that no one else has had the opportunity to do. And, miracle of miracles, Allan is up to the task and has done a miraculously worthy job of seeing those things that needed most to be seen, and then even more miraculously, has done an even worthier job of telling the tale, shining a brilliant beam of light on some very very dark corners of the human soul. Itï¿½s this seeing and telling that sets books like Gulag and Canï¿½t You Get Along With Anyone apart from ordinary fare. Solzhenitsyn personally crossed paths with an awful lot more murderers than Allan Weisbecker has, but Weisbecker does not come off any the worse for it. He takes the lesson and takes it well. And, as Joseph Stalin once said, ï¿½A single death is a tragedy, but a million deaths is a statistic.ï¿½ Solzhenitsynï¿½s genius was to be able to retrieve the tragedy from the statistic, and Weisbeckerï¿½s is to let the tragedy more or less speak for itself, on more than one level. The symmetries, broken and preserved, in this neck of the woods are nothing short of uncanny.
Lying and liars.
Self-serving behavior without regard to the consequences that the self-serving behavior has on those around you.
Even this bookï¿½s publication is testimony to the all the fucking crap that Weisbeckerï¿½s had to endure. Weisbecker called bullshit on the publisher of In Search Of Captain Zero, and in response did the publisher see to it that the bullshit was identified and rooted out, the better to promote, and therefore increase profits, on Zero? Hell fucking no, they didnï¿½t. Instead, they closed ranks against him, and took the loss rather than tolerate someone amongst them with the temerity to question themselves or their motives. This is Good Old Boy-ism taken to an absurd level, with vicious intent, just to cover the lying stealing good old boys, and girls, in question.
This is actually several books, and theyï¿½re all sort of snarled up together in a way that can cause the unwary miss the significance of all sorts of noteworthy things, large and small. Weï¿½re basically dealing with the excruciating details of a fatally flawed relationship (more on that in a bit), a real-world murder mystery and the consequences that come with the unraveling of it, and an engine-room level tour of the filth, greed, and mendacity that constitutes the core ï¿½valuesï¿½ of the entertainment industry in general, and the book publishing and movie subsets of that industry in particular.
Weï¿½re going to be taking a little ride here, and our tour guide knows the ins and outs of rides in a way that very few people on earth do. Weisbecker has taken rides, and been taken for a ride, in ways that can only astound you once you immerse yourself within Canï¿½t You Get Along With Anyone.
CYGAWA is one of those deceptive things that has the power to let you believe that itï¿½s not particularly deep or considerable, and is written well enough that it succeeds admirably on just the ï¿½Oprahï¿½ level alone.
Lotta goddamned drama.
One HELL of a lot of goddamned drama.
Which is right up the alley of those types who just sort of skim through life, voyeuristically diverting themselves from their own worthless lot with the kinds of gossipy, through-the-keyhole amusements that shallow people just canï¿½t seem to get enough of.
This book stands as an indictment against us all. We are, all of us, less than we believe ourselves to be.
We are venal.
We cloak ourselves in a mantle of respectability, righteousness, or some other well-crafted warp and weft of justification, and we go about our daily affairs indignant that those around us so signally fail to measure up to our own lofty standards.
But it's all a bunch of bullshit.
It's fucking bullshit from top to bottom, and anybody who claims otherwise is pushing an agenda, and that agenda has their own goddamned motherfucking self-interest as its foundation and core, and nothing else.
This is probably the hardest book review that Iï¿½ve ever written, for two reasons. One: This is an amazingly deep and complicated book that addresses a wealth of bedrock issues lying at the heart of the human condition. Two: Every time I picked it back up and started reading the damn thing, I found myself stopping and dashing off fragments of this review, the better to keep from losing yet another salient point in the review. The fucking review was attempting to run longer than the book! This second reason speaks back toward the first in that itï¿½s a pretty strong indication of just exactly how much important, nay unignorable, information is compacted within the pages of CYGAWA. The fucking thing just oozes insightful takes on What It Means To Be Human, out of the pores of its skin, without even trying to. Again, for the umpteenth time, in a similar fashion to Solzhenitsynï¿½s better works.
Iï¿½m trying to somehow cut the length of this review (easily the longest book review thatï¿½s ever run off the ends of my fingers). But as of writing these very words, Iï¿½ve only managed to make it to just a little past the halfway point to page 318 in a 538 page book and what Iï¿½ve committed to disk is way past the three thousand word mark and is showing no signs of abating. (Note to those of you with mathematical inclinations: If this review winds up coming in under five thousand words, it does NOT mean that things did in fact abate. Instead, it means that I took one look at the mass of words I had, realized that nobody is going to wade through something like that just to learn whatï¿½s in some book or other, and I cut things to bring it down to a more manageable size. That said, me being me, I might just say fuckit, and let the thing run wild and let the problem become the readerï¿½s. Guess weï¿½ll just have to wait and see what winds up happening, eh?)
Of all the illustrated groups of people that Allan crosses paths with in this book, and then suffers at the hands of their duplicity and selfishness, it seems clear that most honorable pair in the whole parade are the drug runners (government drug runners like William Casey and Oliver North excepted of course) and the thieves (again, government or other organizational thieves excepted). Blue collar drug runners. Blue collar thieves. With these guys, you at least already know where you stand with them from the start. Not so the more ï¿½sophisticatedï¿½ (And did I really need to put those quotation marks around sophisticated? No, probably not, now that I think about it.) members of the genus homo. This is yet another deceptively simple aspect to this book that, upon closer examination, yields a trove of insight to those with the wit to see whatï¿½s down there beneath the surface of things, and one that could easily be missed by those without the time to properly masticate this sonofabitch: In life, itï¿½s the crooks who oftentimes turn out to be the straightest shooters of the lot.
Treacherously unfaithful lover. Implications. Building tension as the situation escalates, you the reader knowing all too well whatï¿½s really going on, but hoping against hope that things will somehow work out, even as you become more and more impatient for the goddamned final scene to arrive and release you from your tension.
But weï¿½re reading Weisbecker here, remember? And Weisbecker, just like Solzhenitsyn, knows that unless he documents the living shit out of every last little thing, you might come away with a shadow of a doubt in your mind. No way, baby! Youï¿½re getting ALL of it. And itï¿½s not like ALL of it is in any way superfluous, or unnecessary. ALL of it speaks and speaks well to the subject at hand. But goddamned can it ever wear down on you! One can only imagine how living it wore down on the author.
Narrated from the INSIDE. A new and very unsettling perspective.
The only way to deal with liars is to lie to them. This then presents its own moral problems. It seems as if the liars amongst us have tainted us one and all.
When lying to defend against liars, or even worse, to ascertain the truth, one begins to dance through a minefield, or perhaps some hot zone overflowing with contagion that will surely infect you with the very thing you seek to cleanse from your life unless you are very careful. Liars know this, and the ruinously short-sighted motherfuckers gleefully seek to spread their own fatal disease to all those who attempt to catch them out.
There are a LOT of people out there who are going to do their best to see to it that this book sinks like a stone. And our job, as readers, and as understanders is to fight back against the selfish destructive cocksuckers by doing whatever it takes to ensure that this book rises all the way to the top. Buy a copy for yourself. Buy a copy for your friends. Spread the word. Help those who have read all of it or only part of it with their FULL understanding of whatï¿½s really going on with this book. Thereï¿½s a war on, and the Bad Guys are winning right now. This awful situation has got to change, or weï¿½re all going down the drain together, Good Guys, Bad Guys, All Guys.
Even crooked dogs! That also still get loved, even though theyï¿½re crooked.
Denial. Denial about denial. Denial about denial aboutï¿½ well, you get the idea.
Weisbecker mentions people like Bush, Rumsfeld, Hussein, and other lesser lights as reasons why the world is so fucked up. For myself, Iï¿½m not so sure about this. Yes, theyï¿½re all a bunch of lying shitballs. Yes, theyï¿½re VERY fucked up. Butï¿½ I wonder how people like this can so consistently and saliently get their hands on the levers of power, be it globally or be it in our bedrooms, and I get the creepy feeling that itï¿½s us thatï¿½s causing it. WE are the problem, down at the very rootest level. WE need these fucks, or other fucks, to effect our own agendas with. Liars lie and when it serves the interest of those being lied to, then Let The Lying Times Roll. Somewhere, thereï¿½s a flaw in the human makeup that is so fundamental, so basic, that liars are ALWAYS going to be around for us to put up with. Or is it even a flaw? Is evolution just mindlessly selecting for this shit without asking anybodyï¿½s opinion as it does so? If so, WHY? And right about here, the lights go out for me. I do not fucking know. But what I do know is that when somebody lies and the lie serves our collective self interest, weï¿½re happy to not only let it go, hell weï¿½ll help the sonofabitch. Itï¿½s only when the lies conflict with our self interest that we howl in protest. Not a very cheerful thought, when you get right down to it.
This is a book to read for those who would Know the Truth. Which is ultimately impossible of course, but the sense of the thing stands, regardless. This is also a book to read for those who would Peek Through the Keyhole. Which is ultimately a despicable act of course, but the sense of the thing stands, regardless. And who knows? Maybe a little Truth (impossible to know, though it is) could possibly rub off on the keyhole peerers whilst engaged in their nasty little pastime. It could happen. And if it happened, it would be a Good Thing. This is also a book to read for those who like their books on the rich, ramified, and even recondite side. Books that reward rereading. This thing has got so many layers, so many differing levels of understanding, that it will satisfy anyone who seeks the sort of written material that engages the reader in a dialogue. People who donï¿½t get this, donï¿½t get this, and I advise them not to let it worry them. Go read the thing for your own reasons and donï¿½t worry about weirdnesses like some guy in a room somewhere having a fucking dialogue with a goddamned book, ok?
Did you notice all the motherfucking cuss words in this review? Well the book has a similar seasoning, too. Nice-nasties, and those who would Bowdlerize the world around them, probably shouldnï¿½t read this book. Too much truth. Might cause ï¿½em to pop a blood vessel or something. Canï¿½t be having any of that, now can we? The truth swears like a sailor, in case you were wondering.
Ok, enough with the fucking christmyass music, ok?
The only people who like the stuff are hopeless mopes and greed-crazed merchants, who INSIST upon subjecting everyone who enters their establishment (pity the poor souls who have to show up and endure 40! hours, or more, of this stuff weekly) to a nonstop bath of this stuff in the faint hope that it will induce one of the stupider lemmings on the shop floor to buy yet another worthless (or, perhaps very expensive, but still worthless when you really think about it) trinket to assuage their year’s worth of accumulated guilt over not paying sufficient attention to some schmuck or other who never deserved the first minute’s attention in the first place.
It doesn’t come any shallower than christmyass music.
Phony, prepackaged emotions, for the emotionally dysfunctional.
Holiday cheer? Fuck you. What’s wrong with a little cheer for the other 364 days of the year? Are you such a COMPLETE asshole that you actually NEED some kind of aural jumpstart to cause you to be CHEERFUL? If so, you really need to a.) kill yourself right this minute, or b.) go out there somewhere and try to find yourself some kind of a life.
I prefer to be loads of fun most all the time, thank you. Except for when some idiot with a bogus smile welded to their face INSISTS that I “join in” all the “fun.”
This fucking shit is no damn fun, and anybody with more than two functioning neurons to rub together can attest to that fact. I shall not be obligated to your Cultural Imperialism, and neither shall I dress out for this little P.E. class, coach.
And fuck your goddamned idiotic music while we’re at it here.
If you MUST get involved with this fake shit, at least try to show an atom or three of honest creativity, ok?
I know what lets do, lets see if any of you fucks can come up with some christmyass music on your own. But, in order to keep things on the up and up, and to keep you from just grabbing whatever audio clip-art pieces you want, and pasting them together, let’s see if we can do it without all the prepackaged bullshit.
Go ahead and make your fucking little harmony without the following words:
CHRISTMAS (Don’t go giving me any shit over this deletion, ok? Stop and think for a minute about the zillion different ways that rock and rollers have come up with to say “let’s fuck” without ever actually using the words themselves. Surely, if your christmyass is such a culturally fundamental deal, then you won’t have the least trouble making your happy little song without it).
JINGLE (Nor any variation thereof).
JESUS (I really don’t care WHO’s fucking deal this supposedly is. I could NOT care less for jesus, mohammed, allah, or any of the rest of that demented crap. See above re: cultural imperialism).
SLEIGH (I live in Florida where that sort of medieval transportation system is not required and furthermore my idea of a swell time does NOT consist in looking at the ass end of some smelly horse from close range).
CHILDREN (Nor any variation thereof).
TOY (not even sex toys).
MERRY (This is a word that NOBODY ever uses. That's because it sounds REALLY stupid. I say let's scrap the motherfucker and be done with it).
SNOW (See above re: Florida. Snow is for people too stupid to move away from unlivable conditions. And then the dumb fucks attempt to convince the rest of us how wonderful the stuff is. Yeah. Right. Sure thing, Bucko.)
Alright. That's enough. Now go and make your little song. And when you're done you can play the damned thing as much as you want.
As long as I'm not around.
Inside the asylum:
Loony 1 “Whatta ya say we go kill a tree?”
Loony 2 “Wow! That sounds really cool. Let’s go do it right now! But instead of killing just one tree, let’s kill MILLIONS of them!”
Loony 1 “Bitchin! And I know what, let’s make a big ceremony while we’re doing it, ok?”
Loony 2 “Too much, dude! We’ll get EVERYBODY involved with it! Maybe the whole country! Maybe the WHOLE WORLD!”
Loony 1 “Yeah!”
Cut to the real world:
And oh yeah guys, don’t forget to do it again each and every year, ok?
Would somebody please help me out here with christmas trees? Preferably somebody from OUTSIDE the asylum?
What in the fuck do these fucking idiots THINK they’re doing here? Is there any thinking taking place at all? Or is this yet another priceless example of Lemmings at Play? Well, maybe not. At least not the “at play” part. christmas trees are capable of generating a wide vista of curse words coming from the poor schlub who has to RIG the fucker. And, now that I think of it (even as I bash these keys), it’s almost ALWAYS a GUY who has to rig the damned thing. Yet another example of how guys idiotically permit themselves to be manipulated by wimmin. Do I want to go off on a guy/wimmin tangent right now? Nah. Maybe later. Let’s get back to our original rant, ok?
In case you didn’t know (Just drop in from Neptune, hmm?), christmas trees take a LOT of rigging. And that’s not even counting the ridiculous Dance of Bullshit that’s involved with merely SELECTING the damned thing, down at the christmas tree lot. Christmas Tree Lot. What a concept! I don’t even want to discuss all the horseshit required to verify that your newfound Sacrificial Shrubbery is worthy of being placed upon its altar. Let’s just skip that shit, ok? Hell, I’m halfway through my rant and I haven’t even started my rant yet. Christmas trees can do that to a guy.
We’re gonna bring home a sawed-off tree and let it die a slow agonizing death. But we don’t want it to die too fast now, do we? That would spoil all the fun. The needles would fall off too soon. Can’t be having any of that, can we? Does the tree get a vote in all this? Hell no. My guess is that it’s some kind of vegan conspiracy.
Vegans. Murderous motherfuckers. Once they’ve decided that they won’t “eat anything that can see them,” or whatever (Eggs can’t see, can they? Come to think of it, dead chickens don’t see worth a shit either, do they? But somehow the vegan knows What’s Right.), it’s open season on everything else. Do I want to go off on a vegan tangent right now? Nah, Maybe later.
Meanwhile, even as the tree emits a piercing death wail perceptible only to other trees, Mummy and Dummy are busily moving furniture around in order to make a place in the living room for the damned (in more ways than one) thing, so as to cheer the hearts of their little tots. And also jump them into the gang by teaching them the Ways of The Tree.
Ok, it’s not weird enough that we’ve put a doomed evergreen in the house with us. We need more.
I know, let’s HANG shit on it.
Is this why god gave trees branches? One could make a fair decent case in favor of that proposition.
And let’s not just hang ANYTHING on it, ok? Let’s hang a bunch of DANGEROUS stuff up there. Let’s put a little excitement into it. Let’s make this thing so attractive that no waking four year old can resist grabbing it to check it out. GLASS ornaments, what a great idea! ELECTRIC lights, what a great idea! Zillions of little strips of plastic, coated in conductive aluminum, what a great idea! Hell, forget the four year old, this thing has the power to kill ANY of us.
And it DOES kill people! Lots of them. Every year. But does the local eyewitless news presenter give us a breathless account of the incredible risk-taking behavior of everybody who pulls out into traffic (consider THAT for your list of risk-taking behavior) with a christmas tree sticking out of the trunk of the family sedan?
Of course not. What are you, some kind of communist?
And then we’ll put the presents (What, exactly, is the deal with putting presents under a fucking half dead tree in the living room?) way back up underneath the fucker where there’s a much better chance of knocking the whole psychotic array down while we’re crawling around back there.
And then we’ll just sort of let it sit there, doing more or less nothing (we hope) until the Big Day. After which, it continues to do more or less nothing until somewhere around the turn of the year. At which point, we go through an incredible hassle to UNrig it and get it the hell out of the house and out by the curb, so the poor overworked trash guys can come and remove its ugly carcass from our presence.
Is this not one of the STUPIDEST things you can POSSIBLY imagine?
Nevermind that things should go horribly wrong at three a.m., and the cat decide to pounce upon a glittering bauble dangling from it, causing it to tip over and spill the water in the stand thing it’s imprisoned within, which then floods over to the part of the tree where there’s a bare spot on the wiring for the lights, sparking a massive short circuit, which then ignites the tinder-dry twigs and branches of the thing, starting a fire that melts all the plastic in the toys underneath it, which produces a highly toxic cloud of gas, which proceeds to asphyxiate everyone in the house before any of them have a chance to wake up and call the fire department to come and put out the blaze which winds up burning down the ENTIRE apartment complex, killing an additional thirty-seven people, three of whom never wanted any damn thing at all to do with christmas, trees, presents, cats, fires, or any of the rest of it, but who died anyway for no reason at all.
Fuck that shit. I’m not having anything to do with ANY of it, and I don’t care what any of you lemming bastards have to say about it.